Criminal Crosswords
Across
- 4. In manslaughter cases, an intervening act will not break the chain of causation if it is connected to the accused's actions and of the same general character
- 7. Harm to others is not a principle of fundamental justice
- 8. There must be an air of reality to raise the defence of provocation
- 11. A “public place” is any place to which the public has physical access to
- 13. The personal characteristics of the accused, aside from incapacity, are irrelevant in assessing objective mens rea
- 16. The mens rea required for attempted murder is specific intent to kill
- 19. There is no consent between adults who intentionally apply force causing serious hurt or non-trivial bodily harm
- 20. Absolute liability offences cannot have a penalty of imprisonment
- 21. The quantitative threshold for a valid criminal law purpose is a reasonable apprehension of harm
- 22. A "duty imposed by law” includes a duty which arises at common law
- 23. Child abandonment requires subjective mens rea
Down
- 1. Where the statutory language requires proof of an ulterior purpose, recklessness cannot be the standard of mens rea
- 2. Subjective foresight of death is the minimum fault requirement for murder
- 3. In manslaughter cases, even if the unlawful act alone would not have caused the death, it is still a legal cause so long as it contributed in some way
- 5. A momentary act of negligent driving does not amount to dangerous driving
- 6. Condom use is a part of the “sexual activity in question”
- 9. The "beyond de minimis" test is applicable for all forms of culpable homicide
- 10. Judicial notice of social context evidence is admissible in sentencing
- 12. When dealing with true crimes, start with the presumption that there is a subjective fault element required
- 14. An "undertaking" in S. 217 CCC requires a clearly made commitment with binding intent
- 15. The law authorizing the use of corrective force on children is constitutional
- 17. Failure to comply with a bail conditions requires subjective mens rea
- 18. The courts may reconsider a prior decision from a higher court when a new legal issue is raised