Debate Final Review

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243
Across
  1. 4. The stock issue that explains why we should care about the Harms.
  2. 6. The specific way that debaters take notes.
  3. 8. The part of the Disadvantage that establishes what is going on in the Status Quo that won't continue if the AFF plan passes.
  4. 9. One purpose of cross-examination is to set up ___________.
  5. 11. The stock issue that proves that / explains why the Harms are not being solved in the Status Quo.
  6. 13. The really bad thing that will be avoided or caused if we pass the AFF.
  7. 17. An argument, run by the NEG, that attempts to solve the Harms more efficiently than the AFF plan can.
  8. 20. The part of the disadvantage that links the link to the impact.
  9. 21. A general term for all the facts/info used to support arguments in the round.
  10. 23. What we want to happen in every debate round, where each team attack's the other team's arguments successfully.
  11. 24. An argument that either the AFF or NEG can run, which criticizes the mindset of the opposing team's arguments.
  12. 25. ____________ means the the issue should be the very first thing the judge considers when voting.
  13. 26. The 4/5 things the AFF has to uphold in the round.
  14. 27. The stock issue that proves that something bad is happening / will happen if the AFF doesn't pass.
  15. 28. One purpose of cross-examination is to ask _________ about the previous speech.
  16. 29. This type of AFF case structure has Inherency, Solvency, Plan Text, and multiple Advantages.
  17. 31. The AFF team's responsibility to uphold the Stock Issues and affirm the Resolution is called their burden of ___________.
  18. 32. The 2NC and 1NR make up what we call the ____________.
  19. 36. The first part of a Topicality argument, which says how the NEG interprets a word from the resolution. Could also be called a definition.
  20. 40. The world as it is without the AFF plan.
  21. 42. The part(s) of the Topicality argument that tell the judge why to prefer the NEG's interpretation.
  22. 43. One purpose of cross-examination is to ___________ information.
Down
  1. 1. The portion of the Counterplan that gives an additional advantage that the AFF can't solve for.
  2. 2. The parts of the 1AC.
  3. 3. A controversial statement that a debater supports or refutes with evidence.
  4. 5. The ___________ speeches are 8 minutes long, and allow each team to set up and respond to new arguments.
  5. 7. The outline given before the start of a speech.
  6. 10. A type of negative argument that tries to prove that the affirmative plan will cause bad things to happen if it is passed
  7. 12. The concept of __________ interpretations says that, in Topicality, the judge should vote for the best interpretation.
  8. 14. The part(s) of the Topicality argument that tell the judge why s/he should vote on Topicality.
  9. 15. The part of the Topicality argument that explains why the AFF doesn't meet the NEG's interpretation.
  10. 16. There are 3 minutes of _________ after each constructive.
  11. 18. The part of the disadvantage that links the disadvantage to the AFF case.
  12. 19. The NEG team's responsibility to negate the AFF team is called the burden of ______________.
  13. 22. The general process of responding to the other team's arguments
  14. 30. A debate tournament usually has 5 of these periods of competition.
  15. 33. The words in an AFF case or Counterplan that say, specifically, what the plan will do.
  16. 34. The reasoning that is used, along with evidence, to support a claim.
  17. 35. The term used to describe what happens when a debater attacks the arguments on the flow in order.
  18. 37. The stock issue that says that the AFF case must fall under the resolution. Also an argument that the NEG can run if the AFF doesn't fall under the resolution.
  19. 38. The topic we debate about for the season
  20. 39. The speeches in the round that are meant to wrap up arguments and explain why each team should win.
  21. 41. The place where the judge writes his/her comments and decision.
  22. 42. The stock issue that is concerned with whether or not the plan can solve for its harms.