TRESPASS TO THE PERSON

123456789101112131415161718
Across
  1. 3. This defence is justified to prevent greater harm
  2. 7. Directly and intentionally applying unlawful force
  3. 10. Total bodily restraint without safe means of escape
  4. 15. Assault negated by words (“If it were not assize time…”)
  5. 17. V COOPER Case distinguishing negligence from trespass
  6. 18. Trespass to the person is ___________ per se — no damage needed.
Down
  1. 1. Claimant need not be aware of false imprisonment
  2. 2. Indirect intentional harm case — causing nervous shock by words
  3. 4. Locked toilet false imprisonment case
  4. 5. Permission as a defence in trespass
  5. 6. v Metropolitan police-Case establishing “continuing act” for battery; car on officer’s foot
  6. 8. involve threatening behaviour which is real and imminent
  7. 9. v Jones False imprisonment must be total restriction
  8. 11. Hostility test for battery
  9. 12. Intent can move between victims
  10. 13. The defendant must this to carry out the threat at the time of the assault
  11. 14. Silent phone calls can constitute assault
  12. 16. V WILCOCK Slightest touching can be unlawful