Chapters 1-5 & 7-14 & 16-19, 21-26 & 29 & 6

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748
Across
  1. 4. A system of classifying and organizing terms.
  2. 6. Specific query researchers want to answer in addressing the research problem.
  3. 10. Relationship or association between two variables.
  4. 13. The peak is off center and one tail is longer than the other.
  5. 15. Involves exposing the same people to more than one condition.
  6. 17. Focuses on the lived experiences of humans and is an approach to learning what the life experiences of people are like and what they mean.
  7. 19. Reflect the ratio of two probabilities.
  8. 22. Characteristic or quality that takes on different values.
  9. 23. Technique of asking participants to take photographs of themselves and then interpret them.
  10. 25. Participants have adequate information about the research.
  11. 27. A listing of each variable together with information about placement in the file, codes associated with the values values of the variable, and other basic information.
  12. 28. ANOVA context, the variance is referred to as...
  13. 29. Observed result could reflect chance fluctuations.
  14. 32. Focuses on story in studies in which purpose is to explore how people make sense of events in their lives.
  15. 35. Refers to the accuracy and consistency of information obtained in a study.
  16. 37. Seeks solutions to existing problems and tends to be of greater immediate utility of EBP.
  17. 39. Sampling to the point at which no new information is obtained and redundancy is achieved.
  18. 40. Paradigm most often associated with Mixed Methods research.
  19. 42. Evaluations are the cornerstone.
  20. 44. Confidence in the truth of the data and interpretations of them.
  21. 45. Risks no greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during routine tests or procedures.
  22. 46. Distribution with two peaks.
  23. 47. Enhances the base of knowledge or to formulate or refine a theory.
  24. 48. Effects of Taking a pretest on people's performance on a posttest.
Down
  1. 1. Original description of a study prepared by the researcher who conducted it.
  2. 2. A code that is not possible
  3. 3. Tendency of observers to be influenced by one characteristic in judging other, unrelated, characteristics.
  4. 5. Statement of predicted relationships between two or more variables.
  5. 7. A design that emerges in the field as the study unfolds.
  6. 8. Rank evidence sources according to the strength of the evidence they provide.
  7. 9. Used to predict outcomes.
  8. 11. Documents the extent to which the goals of the program are attained.
  9. 12. Route respondents through different sets of questions depending on the responses.
  10. 14. The degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure.
  11. 16. The extent to which the sample is similar to the population and avoids bias.
  12. 18. Achieved through accurate measuring tools, controls over confounding variables, and powerful statistical methods.
  13. 20. Stability of data over time and conditions.
  14. 21. Analysis of the theoretical underpinnings on which the studies are grounded.
  15. 24. Researchers view the text as a whole and try to capture its meanings.
  16. 26. Involves judgments about whether findings from an inquiry can be extrapolated to a different setting or group of people.
  17. 30. The process of selecting a portion of the population for a study.
  18. 31. Careful appraisal of a study's strengths and weaknesses.
  19. 33. Method of integrating quantitative findings statistically.
  20. 34. Relationship where the participants in the qualitative strand are a subset of the participants in the quantitative strand.
  21. 36. Influence that distorts study results.
  22. 38. A daily record of events and conversations in the field.
  23. 41. The ability of a measure to detect change over time in a construct that has changed, commensurate with the amount of change that has occurred.
  24. 43. Overall conceptual underpinnings of a study.