Across
- 3. Disadvantage/burden.
- 5. Laid out in Rule 7.
- 8. A case involving negligent driving and Walmart.
- 10. A type of jurisdiction where only one court can hear the case.
- 12. An action that is legally against the property. Ex. US v. property.
- 13. If the plaintiff wants to be in federal court, they do this.
- 14. One test that you can use to analyze purposeful availment.
- 17. Required under Rule 19.
- 18. A case involving a monkey and copyright claims.
Down
- 1. This combination of two cases upends everything we thought we knew post Conley.
- 2. A request for a court order must be made by this.
- 4. Under the requirements of complete diversity, citizenship is defined by this.
- 6. This case gives us an analysis for figuring out what law applies in federal court.
- 7. A type of subject matter jurisdiction where there must be complete diversity and the controversy must exceed $75,000.
- 9. This case is no longer good law. It was a unique case in which the defendant operated a mining company created in the Philippines which was occupied during World War II.
- 11. Statutes that codify the reasons that a court in a particular state can exercise jurisdiction over a defendant.
- 15. Also known as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- 16. The court shall grant this if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.