Debate Nine Weeks' Test Review

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839
Across
  1. 5. the time during a debate designated to prepare the arguments in the speeches that follow
  2. 7. at the beginning of the debate, the speeches given to introduce the arguments that focus on each side of the resolution
  3. 10. benefits gained from adopting the plan
  4. 11. the policy proposed by the affirmative
  5. 12. allows for special cases that might not fit the overall assertion and helps establish credibility in a Toulmin argument
  6. 14. the side arguing that the motion is true
  7. 16. speech designed to oppose what the other team has presented
  8. 17. other side
  9. 18. the side of the debate that defends, argues for, and promotes the resolution.
  10. 21. a specific written proposal made by a member or committee for the assembly to debate
  11. 25. structure of a Lincoln-Douglas debate
  12. 28. the assertion or thesis in a Toulmin argument
  13. 29. proof of why the proposed plan will work and solve the harms that would happen without the plan
  14. 30. the legislative chamber debating what the government would or should do
  15. 31. a method for developing a strong argument
  16. 32. the structure of the teams in World Schools debate
  17. 34. additional evidence used to support the main assertion in a Toulmin argument
  18. 35. a type of legislation that describes the details of how a policy would be enacted, if voted into law by the assembly
  19. 37. structure of a policy debate
  20. 38. side of the academic debate that attacks and argues against the affirmative side of the
  21. 39. connects the assertion and evidence by providing the “because” in a Toulmin argument
Down
  1. 1. short interjection by 1 of the 3 members of 1 a team that can be a question or objection
  2. 2. time allowed in a debate for one side of the round to ask questions of
  3. 3. Latin term that means the existing state of affairs or how things are today
  4. 4. prepared arguments in favor of a team’s side of the motion
  5. 6. chain of events that would happen as a result of the plan that the affirmative team did not think of that would end with something terrible happening
  6. 8. acknowledges the other side of the argument and persuades readers to ignore bias in a Toulmin argument
  7. 9. – a principle or standard by which you evaluate the resolution
  8. 13. major issue or value in the debate, sometimes called a point
  9. 15. the final terrible result that will happen because of the plan’s change to the status quo
  10. 19. speeches intended to explain why each side has already won the debate
  11. 20. the smaller points within a substantive
  12. 22. of the round relate
  13. 23. barriers preventing the adoption of the plan in the current system
  14. 24. the argument’s foundational evidence that justifies the main viewpoint in a Toulmin argument
  15. 26. system of note-taking used by debaters and judges that documents how all the
  16. 27. the side arguing that the motion is not true
  17. 33. the topic of the debate that will either be affirmed or negated
  18. 36. a contentious assertion that forms the basis for debate