Environmental Science Chapter 1

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536
Across
  1. 7. Making an observation or obtaining a particular result consistently.
  2. 10. Although definitions differ, this generally means valid science according to basic scientific principles.
  3. 12. Altering a particular factor for a test or experiment while holding all others (as much as possible) constant.
  4. 17. Original, independent thinking that asks, “How might I approach this problem in new and inventive ways?”
  5. 20. When a researcher is either offered benefits for cooperating with or threatened with consequences for opposing a person or group, in connection with their research.
  6. 21. Inventing new data or results to lie or mislead in your work.
  7. 22. measurements, observations, and information
  8. 23. The orderly pursuit of knowledge, relying on observations that test hypotheses in order to answer questions.
  9. 25. A tool for representing some aspect of ideas, structures, processes, and explanations within a system or part of a system.
  10. 27. A conditional explanation that can be verified or falsified by observation or experimentation.
  11. 29. Independent variables that help explain differences in the dependent variable.
  12. 31. The application of science and math to solve problems.
  13. 33. observation of natural events to deduce causal relationships.
  14. 35. A design in which researchers don’t know which subjects were given experimental treatment until after data have been gathered an analyzed.
  15. 36. Requirements that need to be met to consider a problem solved.
Down
  1. 1. An ability to evaluate information and opinions in a systematic, purposeful, efficient manner.
  2. 2. A set of moral principles or values that can be used to govern decision-making and behavior for an individual or group.
  3. 3. A rational way of thought that asks, “How can orderly, deductive reasoning help me think clearly?”
  4. 4. One that does not respond to other variables in a particular test.
  5. 5. Also known as response variable; is one affected by other variables.
  6. 6. Repeating studies or tests.
  7. 8. The claiming of someone else’s work or ideas as one’s own.
  8. 9. “Top down” reasoning in which we start with a general principle and derive a testable prediction about a specific case.
  9. 11. Comparison made between two populations that are identical (as far as possible) in every factor except the one being studied.
  10. 13. “Bottom-up” reasoning in which we study specific examples and try to discover patterns and derive general explanations from collected observations.
  11. 14. A relationship where one variable increases and the other decreases.
  12. 15. An explanation or idea accepted by a substantial number of scientists.
  13. 16. Limit a solution’s design and include ideas such as cost, durability, and materials available.
  14. 18. A thoughtful, contemplative analysis that asks, “What does this all mean?”
  15. 19. A way of systematic analysis that asks, “How can I break this problem down into its constituent parts?”
  16. 24. A general agreement among informed scholars.
  17. 26. Selecting data that specifically supports your claim while ignoring or excluding data that does not support or refutes your claim.
  18. 28. The arrangement of data or the misreporting of results to support a claim that the data do not necessarily support.
  19. 30. A great change in explanatory frameworks that occur when a majority of scientists accept that the old explanation no longer describes new observations very well.
  20. 32. Any person or company that funds research and is concerned with the outcome of the research.
  21. 34. A bar graph, generally with upright bars.