Across
- 1. Non-state contribution equal to at least 10%of the grant amount
- 4. The primary intent of funded projects to protect, enhance, or restore water quality
- 6. Recipient of financial assistance responsible for maintaining practice
- 10. A water treatment technology ineligible for grant funding
- 13. Periodic review to ensure maintenance plans are followed and practices remain effective
- 14. Formal document between grantee and landowner establishing project and funding terms
- 15. Study required before proposing in-lake or in-channel treatments
- 17. Tracked for grant staff activities and determines when work is eligible for reimbursement
- 19. Type of payment explicitly prohibited by program rules
- 20. The minimum effective period for a project usually 10–25 years depending on type
- 21. Structural or non-structural methods used to improve or protect water quality
- 24. Measurable results or accomplishments identified in the approved work plan
Down
- 2. Step required from BWSR before certain projects, such as easements or in-lake treatments, can begin
- 3. Required adherence to statutes and contracting rules
- 5. Activity type that measures water quality but is mostly ineligible under this grant
- 7. Key cost principle; all expenditures must meet this test to be allowable
- 8. Term describing expenses that are necessary, reasonable, and directly tied to project outcomes
- 9. Written commitments ensuring a project will be installed, maintained, and operated properly
- 11. Specific actions listed in the implementation plan to achieve water quality goals
- 12. What technical assistance providers must do to confirm a project meets design and construction standards
- 16. Ongoing care and inspection required to keep practices functioning as designed
- 18. Describes activities or costs that cannot be funded, such as incentive payments
- 22. Required process for documenting activities expenditures and outcomes in eLINK
- 23. Must be reasonable, necessary, and directly related to grant activities