Across
- 2. occurs when there is a flaw in reasoning that weakens an argument, in which someone offers a limited number of options when more options exist
- 5. committed by someone when they refuse to agree with, or accept an argument because they don’t like the person or people who have put forth the argument
- 6. occurs when someone attacks the person instead of their argument
- 8. asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proved false, and vise versa
- 9. relies on the statements of a false authority figure, who is framed as a credible authority on the topic being discussed
- 11. when a proposition is accepted for one thing except for one thing that is inherent to the solution
- 17. where one member of the argument or debate offers information to shut down his opponent’s argument that does not directly engage with it
- 18. occurs when a collective term such as “you”, “we”, “everyone” is used without defining exactly who or what is included in the term
- 19. when a question contains an implicit assumption, usually putting the person being questioned in a defensive and unfavorable position
- 20. combination of a straw man and (usually) ad hominem; occurs when the actual claim is ignored, and an unrelated claim about the argument is made
Down
- 1. occurs when one assumes that because two things, or events, have similarities in one or more respects, they are similar in other properties as well
- 3. committed when a person draws a conclusion about a population based on a sample that is prejudiced in some manner
- 4. based on the appeal to popular belief and behavior rather than logical and valid points
- 7. when an argument’s conclusion is contained among its premises
- 10. a logical fallacy in which someone generalizes from a too-small sample size
- 12. happens when an accused person turns an allegation back on their accuser
- 13. appeals to the beliefs, tastes, or values of a group of people, stating that because a certain opinion or attitude is held by a majority, it is therefore correct
- 14. happens when challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer
- 15. occurs when one uses a concept while denying the validity of its genetic roots
- 16. occurs when highly publicized data on one group is assumed to represent a different, or larger group
