Across
- 2. Participants _are required to_ include both perspectives in their response.
- 4. The issue can _conceivably_ be resolved through open dialogue.
- 5. This decision _is likely to_ spark a range of responses.
- 7. The success of the program is _indisputably_ evident in the data.
- 9. The outcome _is expected to_ affect all students equally.
- 11. The policy _is intended to_ create more equitable opportunities.
- 12. They _unequivocally_ support the suggested reforms.
- 14. The proposal is _feasibly_ within our capacity to implement.
- 16. It is _probable_ that we will reach a compromise.
- 17. That explanation is _plausibly_ the most accurate interpretation.
Down
- 1. They _regularly_ engage in respectful debate.
- 3. It is _advisable_ to listen to both perspectives before forming an opinion.
- 4. It is _imperative_ that we consider the long-term impact of this decision.
- 6. Each group _is expected to_ present a balanced argument.
- 8. He _consistently_ supports evidence-based decisions.
- 10. The approach is _permitted_ under the current guidelines.
- 12. This change could _potentially_ benefit both sides of the debate.
- 13. This method is used _infrequently_ due to its complexity.
- 15. The meetings occur _sporadically_ throughout the term. Look at the letter in the numbers 1,6,13,4&3