Research Ethics and Introduction Section

1. pregnant women, children, & individuals with language and/or cognitive deficits
8. manipulating materials, methodology, lying about results, etc. done intentionally
9. no significant difference between variables in the study, stated in the negative
11. specific to general statement
12. Belmont Report; respect & honor decisions, send informed consent form
14. in introduction section, stems from general statement of the problem, gives purpose of study
15. to ensure best current proven intervention is being provided to those who need it
20. in introduction section, summary of past studies in the area, acknowledging any gaps in research or conflicting results
21. general to specific statement
22. predicts results in a specific direction
23. formal included in introduction section, statement of predicted outcome, tentative answer to research question
24. making up data or results
25. established by Nuremburg Code, independent review bodies in colleges, universities, hospitals, and other institutions that review research involving human subjects or animals, consisting of 5+ members from diverse backgrounds

2. stated at the end of the introduction section, specific, descriptive/difference/establishing a relationship
3. appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, or words without giving appropriate credit
4. ensures sound, logical research practices
5. in introduction section, orient reader to what researchers are interested in learning
6. foundation for conduct of research
7. Belmont Report; fair & unbiased selection of participants, distribution of benefits, equal treatment of people in society
10. free choice/voluntary participation in research
13. an honest, professional disagreement among expert clinicians about the preferred treatment; true honest uncertainty
16. looking at specific difference with no direction
17. predicts specific results, 2 types
18. Belmont Report; protect people from harm, disclose benefits and risks
19. selectively reporting data