Review of Week 4 +

Edit Answers
1234567891011121314151617
Across
  1. 1. misrepresenting or exaggerating an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack
  2. 3. using data to impact the reader
  3. 5. drawing broad conclusions based on a small sample size
  4. 6. articulates the essay's central argument for the reader
  5. 7. breakdowns in logic
  6. 10. attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
  7. 11. using credibility as a tool to move the reader
  8. 15. falsely assuming that a minor first step will inevitably lead to a chain of negative events
Down
  1. 2. normal experiences/stepping back as ways to review your subject
  2. 4. presenting only two options (usually extremes) when more exist
  3. 8. categories through which review your subject
  4. 9. using emotions to move a reader
  5. 10. arguing that a claim is true simply because many people believe it.
  6. 12. an analytical critique or assessment of a product, person, thing, etc.
  7. 13. arguing from a comparison that is not valid or relevant in crucial ways
  8. 14. something that grabs the reader's attention
  9. 16. assuming that because one event followed another, the first caused the second
  10. 17. making structural changes to your essay