The Tort Law Paralegal: Chapter 5

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627
Across
  1. 4. A doctrine allowing a plaintiff to recover despite their own negligence if the defendant had the final opportunity to avoid the harm.
  2. 5. A formal agreement, often written, where the plaintiff explicitly agrees to accept a known risk.
  3. 7. A defense based on the plaintiff’s actions showing acceptance of a known risk, even without a formal agreement.
  4. 8. A defense in premises liability cases arguing that the plaintiff should have avoided a hazard that was clearly visible.
  5. 9. An event occurring after the defendant’s actions that contributes to the harm but does not absolve the defendant of liability.
  6. 12. A defense that reduces the plaintiff's damages by the percentage of their fault in causing the injury.
  7. 17. An unforeseeable intervening event that breaks the chain of causation, relieving the defendant of liability.
  8. 18. A defense where the employer argues that an employee’s deviation from their work duties absolves the employer of liability.
  9. 21. A system barring recovery if the plaintiff’s fault exceeds a certain threshold, typically 50% or 51%.
  10. 22. A defense where the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to their injury, which can completely bar recovery in some jurisdictions.
  11. 23. A defense stating that a defendant acted reasonably under the stress of an emergency, which excuses what might otherwise be negligent behavior.
  12. 24. A defense arguing that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted the risks associated with a dangerous activity.
  13. 25. A doctrine protecting charitable organizations from negligence claims under specific conditions, though this has been limited in many jurisdictions.
  14. 26. A doctrine shielding parents from negligence lawsuits filed by their children in certain jurisdictions.
  15. 27. A statute granting immunity to individuals who provide emergency assistance in good faith.
Down
  1. 1. A legal principle supporting immunity or defenses to negligence based on societal interests, such as encouraging emergency aid or government functions.
  2. 2. A defense granting immunity to landowners who allow public recreational use of their land without charging a fee.
  3. 3. The plaintiff's responsibility to take reasonable steps to minimize their damages after the harm occurs.
  4. 6. A defense barring negligence claims against employers when workers' compensation provides the exclusive remedy.
  5. 10. A system allowing a plaintiff to recover damages even if they are 99% at fault, with recovery reduced by their percentage of fault.
  6. 11. Legal arguments used by a defendant to reduce or eliminate liability for a negligence claim.
  7. 13. A defense arguing that an unforeseeable criminal act by a third party breaks the chain of causation and relieves the defendant of liability.
  8. 14. A defense asserting that the harm occurred due to circumstances beyond anyone’s control and not due to negligence.
  9. 15. A legal principle that prevents lawsuits against a government without its consent.
  10. 16. Protection provided by law that shields certain individuals or entities from liability under specific conditions.
  11. 19. A principle allowing rescuers to recover damages if they are injured while attempting to save others from harm caused by the defendant’s negligence.
  12. 20. A doctrine protecting government entities and employees from liability in certain situations unless explicitly waived.